Activation Energy: Favourable Is Not the Same as Likely
Paper on a table will not burn, though burning releases energy. Something has to supply the initial push — and most stalled intentions are barriers, not disagreements about value.
Paper on a table will not burn, though burning releases energy. Something has to supply the initial push — and most stalled intentions are barriers, not disagreements about value.
Cutting inventory frees a lot of cash. The original reason for cutting it was different — stock conceals late suppliers and broken machines, and removing it forces them into view.
Control every part and tune the fit, or accept a standard interface and gain interchangeability. Which one wins turns on a single question — and the answer changes as a market matures.
Buying from specialists is usually cheaper, and sometimes it means you cannot be better than anyone else. The right boundary moves as an industry matures — and rarely gets revisited.
The same behaviour gets explained by character in others and by circumstance in yourself. The asymmetry is not mainly self-flattery — it is what you can and cannot see.
An org chart looks like a diagram of authority. It works as a map of which conversations are cheap — and that is what ends up shaping the product.
Physicists assume observation reveals reality; doctors assume suffering is bad. None of those assumptions can be tested by the field relying on them — and someone has to examine them.
Ten times the users gives roughly a hundred times the possible connections. The exact formula overstates things — the underlying point about compounding leads does not.
The fossil record shows long stretches where species barely change, then rapid shifts. The interesting question is not why change happens in bursts — it is what holds things still for so long.
If each case produces more than one further case, an outbreak grows; below one, it fades. That threshold is simple — and almost everything else about the subject is context-dependent.
The same technology gets overestimated early and underestimated late. Both errors come from drawing a straight line through something that is slow first and rapid afterwards.
Remove one predator and rivers can change course. The size of a change tells you little — what matters is whether the system amplifies it or absorbs it.
New methods can only grow by taking resources from old ones. The productivity gain and the displacement are not cause and side effect — they are the same event seen from two sides.
If people departed randomly from rational choice, the departures would cancel out. They lean consistently in the same directions — which is what makes them worth studying, and worth worrying about.
Every account is assembled from what survived, by someone who already knows the ending. That single fact makes events look more inevitable than they were — and explains why careful history sounds less certain.
You can recognise thousands of faces and actively maintain far fewer relationships. The famous figure of 150 is contested — the underlying constraint is not.
When what you did clashes with what you think, one has to give. The action already happened and the belief is private — so people end up sincerely believing whatever justifies what they did.
Writing's real consequence was not that people could record things — it was that law could outlive its author. Every medium does work that no individual message controls.
Around thirty per cent of numbers in real datasets begin with 1, and only five per cent with 9. People inventing figures don't reproduce that — which is how the pattern became an auditing tool.
One die is flat. Ten dice added together make a bell curve. The shape is a property of adding independent things — which tells you exactly when to expect it and when not to.